Operating & Economic Environment
stable

Major Economic Disruptions

Government actions that severely damage the economy or markets; major, disruptive trade tariffs; destabilizing the dollar; neglecting critical policy action; supply chain disruption

7.0
High

Why This Score

This category scores 7/10, placing it in the High tier (7-8): “Trade wars, GDP-impacting tariff levels, economic isolation policies

  • 1.IEEPA $166B refund suspended after CBP stated it cannot comply; new CAPE refund system targeting April 20 go-live; CIT oral arguments on Section 122 tariffs scheduled April 10 with 24-state AG challenge (Thompson Hine/Cherry Bekaert)
  • 2.USTR launched Section 301 investigations into 16 economies (March 11) targeting manufacturing overcapacity; expedited timeline aims for tariffs by July 24 — timed to replace expiring Section 122 tariffs, creating a deliberate tariff handoff strategy (White & Case/Holland & Knight)
  • 3.Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz closure pushed Brent crude past $120/barrel, amplifying supply chain disruption; EU finalizing up to $108B retaliatory tariff package; Moody's places recession probability at 49% (CNBC/Conference Board)

Score History

July 2025Score: 5
August 202556

Liberation Day tariffs announced; 10% baseline on all imports with country-specific rates up to 49% for China

September 2025Score: 6
October 2025Score: 6
November 2025Score: 6
December 2025Score: 6
January 2026Score: 6
February 2026Score: 6
March 202667

Constitutional crisis over tariff authority: IEEPA struck down, emergency pivot to untested Section 122, $166B refund order, 24-state lawsuit; 40-50% recession probability

Scoring Rubric

1-2

Stable trade relationships, predictable economic policy

3-4

Trade tensions, renegotiation of agreements, some tariff escalation

5-6

Significant tariff actions, supply chain disruptions, retaliatory spirals beginning

7-8Current

Trade wars, GDP-impacting tariff levels, economic isolation policies

9-10

Trade breakdown, severe supply chain collapse, complete withdrawal from global system

Key Findings

1

IEEPA $166B refund suspended after CBP stated it cannot comply; new CAPE refund system targeting April 20 go-live; CIT oral arguments on Section 122 tariffs scheduled April 10 with 24-state AG challenge (Thompson Hine/Cherry Bekaert)

2

USTR launched Section 301 investigations into 16 economies (March 11) targeting manufacturing overcapacity; expedited timeline aims for tariffs by July 24 — timed to replace expiring Section 122 tariffs, creating a deliberate tariff handoff strategy (White & Case/Holland & Knight)

3

Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz closure pushed Brent crude past $120/barrel, amplifying supply chain disruption; EU finalizing up to $108B retaliatory tariff package; Moody's places recession probability at 49% (CNBC/Conference Board)

Scenario Outlook

All scenarios →
CIT strikes down Section 122 tariffs at April 10 oral arguments as lacking balance-of-payments basis
high-1

Removes tariffs and further constrains unilateral presidential trade authority

Section 122 tariffs expire July 24 with no congressional replacement
high-1

Tariffs drop to zero, easing trade friction but creating policy whiplash

Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz closure extend through summer, sustaining $120+ oil prices
high+1

Supply chain disruption from Hormuz closure compounds tariff-related trade friction

EU formally suspends Turnberry trade agreement and activates retaliatory tariffs on $93B of US goods
moderate+2

Full transatlantic trade war; EU retaliatory tariffs hit US agriculture, tech, and services

CIT-ordered $166B IEEPA tariff refund process begins, creating immediate fiscal strain and customs system disruption
high-1

Refunds partially unwind tariff damage; signals judicial accountability on trade policy

CIT issues preliminary injunction against Section 122 tariffs in state AG or importer lawsuit
high-2

All global tariffs suspended pending full litigation; massive relief for importers

USTR imposes Section 301 tariffs on 16 economies by July 24, replacing expiring Section 122 tariffs
high+1

Tariff pipeline ensures no relief even as Section 122 expires; creates permanent tariff cycling through different legal authorities

Bipartisan coalition passes Reclaim Trade Powers Act repealing Section 122, permanently ending unilateral tariff authority
low-2

Eliminates legal basis for current tariffs and prevents future unilateral tariff actions

Economic Sensitivity

Full analysis →
GDP GrowthTrade disruption directly reduces economic activity-70.8% YoY
Inflation ExpectationsTariffs directly increase consumer prices+19% YoY
S&P 500Tariffs and trade wars affect multinational earnings+1.2% YoY
Business InvestmentTrade uncertainty disrupts supply chain investment-28.1% YoY
Foreign Direct InvestmentTrade barriers directly deter FDI-48.3% YoY